Showing posts with label Populations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Populations. Show all posts

Monday, 5 May 2014

The Population of Every Municipality in Canada & Newfoundland with more than 500 Inhabitants in the Year 1901

Contents


1 Introduction
2 Methods of Collection
3 Legend
  • 3.1 Column Headers
  • 3.2 Abbreviations
  • 3.3 Railway Lines
4 The Population Data and Interactive Map
5 Observations
  • 5.1 Overview
  • 5.2 The Most Populated Municipalities in the Year 1901 by Provinces and Territories
  • 5.3 Municipalities by Urban Designation
6 Further Reading and Related Articles
7 Glossary
8 ReferencesComplete External List

1 Introduction


I have an obsession with collecting population data for the year 1900/1901 & I've been collecting data since around 2011. It gives you a lot of insight into how the world was at the time. The further back in time you go the more difficult it is to find reliable comprehensive sources of populations data.

Rand McNally and Company. (1903). British America. Retrieved from the David Rumsey Collection. [9] 

The map above shows the territorial divisions of the Dominion of Canada and the Colony of Newfoundland around the turn of the twentieth century.

My main interest in historic population data stems from the fact that you can use it to infer where infrastructure would have been built at a particular time in history. Buildings are created by humans, so where there are humans, there ought to have been buildings of some type (even is it's a tent, tipi, or a hut) built by them.

In 1901, Montreal was the most populated municipality in Canada. It isn't a surprise that it's also one of the most renowned cities in Canada for historic pre-1900 architecture. Image via: Google Street View.

To me, the years 1900/1901 were a pivotal time in history. It was when Queen Victoria died and King Edward VII ascended to the throne formally closing the Victorian era. It was when new technologies were coming out. Steel was being used to construct buildings of a height greater than six stories. Horseless carriages were beginning to be seen. Even technology for motion pictures was being developed.

Place d'Armes, Montreal, Quebec. Image via: Google Street View.

In the image above, the tall red stone building with a clock tower on the left is the New York Life Insurance Building in Montreal, Quebec. Erected between 1887-1889, it is considered to be Canada's first skyscraper. It incorporated new technologies using iron and steel to help support the structure.

Industry was also exploding. Things were becoming more and more massed produced. Soon assembly lines and systems of interchangeable parts would come into existence. Automobiles would become more common than horses on the streets.

A cotton mill in Marysville, New Brunswick. Image via: Google Street View.

Marysville, which is now a part of Fredericton, is considered to be the best preserved 19th century mill town in Canada. It comes complete with still intact 19th century duplexes that are still used as residences. In the year 1901 the municipality was the 182nd most populated in all of Canada and the 27th in New Brunswick containing 1,892 inhabitants.

Through all of these technological innovations, by 1900/1901 Victorian society still had a delicate taste in architecture that would gradually be lost over subsequent years following the Victorian era. It's my desire to find and admire Victorian and Georgian era architecture of all types (as well as equivalent architecture in other parts of the world) and it is this that drives me to collect so much data regarding this time in history.

Lower-Town, Quebec City. Image via Google Street View.

Quebec City is well known for its old architecture, dramatic location, fortifications, château, citadelle, French culture, and relatively long European history for North America, being founded in 1608 by Samuel de Champlain. It was the third most populated municipality in Canada and the second most in Quebec in the year 1901.

Even some of the least populated communities listed in this article can boast interesting pre-1901 architecture. Below are a couple of examples.

Above is the community of Yamachiche, Quebec. A village known for its Picturesque 19th century brick houses. It was the 337th most populated municipality in Canada and 94th in Quebec being the home of 1,100 inhabitants in the year 1901. Image via: Google Street View.

Above is Millbrook, Ontario. A village that only had 917 inhabitants in 1901 making it the 402nd most populated municipality in Canada. Image via: Google Street View.

2 Methods of Collection


Initially when collecting the data for this article I used data from Library and Archives Canada. (1901). 1901 Census. [10] through a website that summarized each census area by the number of lines per page. I was able to estimate (with great accuracy) the population of a municipality to the nearest 50. Since then I've revised and corroborated my data with Rand McNally & Co.'s Enlarged Business Atlas and Shippers' Guide. (1903). [9] where in their indices they indicated the populations of all of the municipalities in their atlas.

Rand McNally is an American company centred in Chicago and many of their place names for Quebec and New Brunswick were Anglicized making place identification difficult (since the names are typically in French by convention). This difficulty was compounded since many communities in Quebec have amalgamated or changed their names numerous times since 1901. I had to do a lot of research to track down the current names and locations of these municipalities. In section 4.5 I have an interactive Google map displaying every municipality found in this article.

I also referred to Dept. of the Interior, Canada. (1911). Population, 1911: Cities and towns with population upwards of 7,000. [8] published by the Canadian Department of the Interior which highlighted the population trends of municipalities that had more than 7,000 inhabitants in 1911 all the way back to the first census in 1871.

A number of municipalities especially in the Maritimes are more like "rural municipalities" that are highly decentralized. Many of them have also declined in population as well since fishing and farming have decreased. Many other communities all over Canada especially in British Columbia, the Maritimes, and Quebec were once mining centres that have nearly become ghost-towns. A number of rail-towns and ports have also declined.

The rate of incorporation for municipalities with populations lower than 2,000 appears to vary from region to region. For instance, in the Maritimes municipalities don't appear to have been formally incorporated unless they had a couple thousand inhabitants opposed to the threshold being around 1,000 for much of Ontario and Quebec. When it comes to Western Canada the threshold appears to be much lower though. All of this is what I've observed and I haven't found an official statement to confirm my observations.

Newfoundland's data is the hardest to come by since Newfoundland at the time wasn't part of the Canadian Confederation and didn't take censuses during the same years. It is likely largely underrepresented in this article especially for communities with less than 2,000 inhabitants. With many of my figures I've had to estimate the populations using data that was collected by businesses and churches around 1901. It's because of this that I exclude Newfoundland from the main population data and give it a subsection of its own.

Many of the municipalities listed do not exist anymore since they've become amalgamated with nearby municipalities as they grew (see section 5.1). The rise of the automobile & public transportation also allowed for the development of commuter neighbourhoods (see section 5.2).

Many of the county seats were identified by using maps published by Rand McNally, Cram, and the Dominion Publishing Company. For Quebec, the seats were identified by Appleton, D. & Co. (1891). Map of Quebec 50. [30]. Ontario's and some of Quebec's were also verified by the Dominion Publishing Company. (1899). The Canadian Dominion Survey, With Distances, A New Railway, Post-Office,Township and Precinct Map Of Ontario and Quebec. [31]. Manitoba's and British Columbia's were identified by using Cram, G. F. (1901). Cram's Standard American Railway System Atlas of the World.  [5].

3 Legend


In this section I outline what each column header and abbreviation means in section 4.

3.1 Column Headers


In section 4 are two tables. The first one displays every municipality in the Dominion of Canada with more than 500 inhabitants in the year 1901. The second one displays what data has been collected for the Colony of Newfoundland. The tables include the following headings which can be clicked on to sort ascending or descending:

  • Untitled: This number column is permanent in its order and doesn't change as you sort by different columns. This can be used for reference as you're comparing data (particularly amalgamation and agglomeration populations). 
  • # (Number): This column indicates the population rank of the municipality within the Dominion of Canada in the year 1901. 
  • Municipality: The name of the municipality is given. Alternative spellings are separated by "/" and if the municipality has been renamed (but not absorbed, amalgamated, or reincorporated as massive area [i.e., Mississauga]) the new name will be in (parentheses). 
  • County: The name of the county the municipality is located in. If it is located in a district and not a county the name is followed by "Dist.". If the county has changed name, amalgamated, dissolved, or reincorporated as a different entity, that is stated in (parentheses) unless it has formed a regional municipality which in that case the name will be under "Amalgamation".
  • # in Co. (Number in County): This is the municipality's 1901 population rank relative to the other municipalities in its county.
  • Total in Co. (Total in County): This is the total number of municipalities with more than 500 inhabitants in the year 1901 present in the county the municipality is found in. This is given for reference since it can give you insight as to how the municipality compares to its neighbours. 
  • Seat: If the municipality is the seat of its county a "Yes" is displayed.
  • Prov. (Province): The province the municipality is found in. If it was located in a territory in 1901 the name of the modern province it is currently located in is located at the end in (parentheses).
  • # in Prov. (Number in Province): This is the municipality's 1901 population rank relative to other municipalities in its province. 
  • Cap. (Capital): If the municipality is a capital, whether it is the provincial capital (Prov.) or the federal capital (Fed.) is stated in this column.
  • Pop. (Population): The 1901 population of the municipality.
  • U.D. (Urban Designation): The formal designation of either City, Town, Village, or Unincorporated (Uninc.).
  • Amalg.? (Amalgamation?): If the municipality no longer exists because it has been part of an amalgamation, a "Yes" is displayed in this column. 
  • Amalg. (Amalgamation): If the municipality has been part of an amalgamation the primary predecessor municipality (most populated or namesake) is stated in this column. When sorting by this column the primary predecessor municipality will rank first. 
  • Amalg. Pop. (Amalgamation Population): The sum of all of the municipalities that existed in 1901 that contained more than 500 inhabitants that have amalgamated with the primary predecessor municipality. This includes the primary predecessor municipality's population (e.g., the population of Montreal proper (primary predecessor municipality) in 1901 was 267,730 inhabitants and when you add the 1901 population of all of the municipalities that currently make up Montreal's present day incorporation it adds up to 334,193 inhabitants). This column also contains the population of all of the municipalities which didn't amalgamate to allow for a population comparison.
  • Diff. (Difference): The amalgamation population minus the population proper of the primary predecessor municipality.
  • Agglom.? (Agglomeration?): If the municipality is currently situated within the commuter area of a much larger present day municipality a "Yes" is displayed.
  • Agglom. (Agglomeration): If the municipality is currently situated within the commuter area of a much larger present day municipality the abbreviated name of the larger municipality is given in this column.
  • Agglom. Pop. (Agglomeration Population): The sum of all of the municipalities that existed in 1901 that contained more than 500 inhabitants that are within an municipality's modern commuter area. This includes the population of the of the primary urban predecessor municipality (or municipality) proper and all of the municipalities that have been annexed by it. This column also contains the population of all of the municipalities which didn't amalgamate or happen to be within the commuter area of a more influential modern municipality to allow for population comparison.
  • Δ Diff. (Total Change in Difference): The agglomeration population minus the population proper of the primary predecessor municipality.
  • Rail Companies: Which rail companies provided service in the area [7] [5]. 
  • # of Rail Lines: An enumeration of the number of lines radiating from each municipality (node) [7] [5]. 
  • Navigable Waterbody: The name of the navigable waterbody the municipality is on [7] [5]. 
  • Great Lakes Waterway: If the municipality is in some way connected to the Great Lakes and Saint Lawrence River by a navigable route, a "Yes" is displayed in this column [7] [5]. 
  • Ocean: If the municipality is on or is in some way connected to an ocean by a navigable waterway (naturally, by canal, or other engineering projects), the name of that ocean is displayed in this column. If the municipality is on a landlocked navigable waterbody "Inland" is displayed [7] [5]. 
  • Electric Streetcars: If the municipality possessed an electric streetcar system in the year 1901, the year it first opened as an electric route is stated along with when it was discontinued. If the municipality was a commuter suburb of a larger one with a streetcar system, many times it was also serviced by it. In these cases if they were serviced by it before or by 1901 the same dates stated for the primary municipality will also be stated for them. 
  • Banks: A "Yes" is displayed if the municipality had banking services in 1901 [5]. 
  • Sources: The sources for the population figure. Each number corresponds to the numbers used in the reference section at the end of this article. 


3.2 Abbreviations


3.3 Railway Lines



It is important to note though, that the amalgamation and agglomeration populations do not reflect the total population that would have resided within those areas in 1901 since we are only using urban populations (threshold of 500 inhabitants) and discarding the rural population that would of also occupied the area.

Also, concerning the counties column there are two special cases. When it comes to the District of Algoma, since 1901 parts of it have broken off and formed the Districts of both Sudbury and Manitoulin. Due to this the numerical ordering is inconsistent for Algoma when sorting by counties. When it comes to the municipality of Bear River, it's split between the counties of Annapolis and Digby. Since each municipality is only listed once in the data, I've chosen to list it as being present under Annapolis' count of four municipalities and leave Digby as missing one of its four municipalities

4 The Population Data and Interactive Map


In this section are two interactive tables and an interactive Google map. One table is for the Dominion of Canada and the other is for the Colony of Newfoundland. The tables have their own independent scroll bars on the bottom and on the right of their interface. You can use them to navigate from column to column and row to row.

The data for Canada and Newfoundland are displayed separately because Newfoundland's data is incomplete since the colony didn't take censuses during the same years as the Dominion of Canada and data is scarce.

Beneath the tables is the interactive Google map, close by to allow one to go back and forth easily. A gold star icon represents 100,000+ inhabitants, red star 10,000-100,000, diamond 5,000-10,000, square 2,500-5,000, circle 1,000-2,500, and pink circle 500-1,000. When you click on an icon it will display the municipality's population and rank for the year 1901. Since I've updated the data on this article since making the map the rank in the description of each icon is slightly inaccurate. So it's best to refer to the data in the article. Nevertheless, the rank still gives you a very good ballpark measurement. There's a full screen option on the map in the upper right of its interface, that version has a search bar that you can use to search for any of the municipalities.

Interactive Map with Street View enabled (Unstable)

- Information last updated 02/09/2014







5 Observations


5.1 Overview


In the year 1901 the population of the Dominion of Canada was 5,371,315 inhabitants & the population of the Colony of Newfoundland was 220,984. At the time only 38% of the dominion was urbanized. Today, 80.7% of Canada's population is urbanized. Below is a provincial-territorial-colonial breakdown of the population followed by percent urbanization [1] which everything is sorted by. Beneath them are figures that have been derived from this article specifically:



  • British Columbia: 178,657 | 50%: 
    Municipalities: 27
  • Ontario: 2,182,947 | 43%: 
    Municipalities: 292
  • Quebec: 1,648,898 | 40%: 
    Municipalities: 237
  • Nova Scotia: 459,574 | 28%: 
    Municipalities: 72
  • Manitoba: 255,211 | 28%: 
    Municipalities: 23
  • Northwest Territories (at the time included a large portion of Manitoba & what would become both Alberta & Saskatchewan): 211,649 | 24%: 
    Municipalities: 20
  • New Brunswick: 331,120 | 23%: 
    Municipalities: 37
  • Prince Edward Island: 103,259 | 14%: 
    Municipalities: 6
  • Newfoundland: 220,984 | ?%: 
    Municipalities: 10



A pie chart showing the distribution of population in what would become Canada today.

A pie chart showing the distribution of the municipalities listed in this article by province/territory.

Below is a series of maps illustrating the population density present in Canada in 1901 (published in 1906). The maps shown from top to bottom are as follows: The Maritime Provinces, Quebec & Ontario, Manitoba & Saskatchewan, and Alberta & British Columbia. 

Dept. of the Interior (1906). Density of Population Maritime Provinces, Quebec, Ontario. Retrieved from Natural Resources Canada [7].

Dept. of the Interior (1906). Density of Population British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba. Retrieved from Natural Resources Canada [7].


It's interesting to note the correlation between the maps above and the interactive Google map of the municipalities listed in this article in a section further down. This helps confirm the validity of the data collected in this article. 

5.2 Population Distribution Among Municipalities


The chart below show the distribution of the municipalities by population. It only includes around the 187 most populated (1,827 and up) due to practical limitations.



The immense magnitude of the cities of Montreal and Toronto in relation to the other municipalities in the chart above is astonishing.

Berlin (Kitchener), Ontario, the 29th most populated in the Dominion of Canada in 1901 with 9,747 inhabitants can boast some pretty substantial Victorian constructions. To the right is the Walper Terrace Hotel, built in 1893. Explore on Google Street View.

Rand McNally and Company. (1903). Montreal. Retrieved from the David Rumsey Collection. [9] 

The map above shows the wards and communities that surrounded the city of Montreal around the turn of the twentieth century. The communities visible here that are listed in this article include: Côte-des-Neiges, Côte-Saint-Paul, Outremont, Maisonneuve, Sainte-Cunégonde, Saint-Henri, Saint-Louis-du-Mile-End, Verdun, and Westmount. Interestingly, Saint-Henri happened to be the twelfth most populated municipality in Canada in 1901.

5.3 Municipalities by Urban Designation


The only rule that I know of is that to qualify as a city in British North America in the 1800's you had to have a population of at least 10,000 inhabitants.
  • Unincorporated: 199
  • Villages: 266
  • Towns: 206
  • Cities: 46




A pie chart showing the distribution of the urban designations of "unincorporated', "village", "town", & "city".


St. Marys, Ontario, the 97th most populated in Canada in 1901 with 3,384 inhabitants. It was incorporated as a town. It is also known as the "Stone Town". Explore on Google Street View.

6 Further Reading and Related Articles


For links to all of my related writings you can visit my Population Data and Architecture Articles page.

7 Glossary



    • Amalgamation: The process of combining or uniting multiple entities into one form. 
    • British North America: A term to refer to the colonies and territories of the British Empire in continental North America. Largely used in the 19th century. 
    • Commuter City: A smaller city that is found on the periphery of a much larger city. Commuter cities are also commonly referred to as a "bedroom community" since many of the inhabitants may live in them but travel to the primary city for their occupation.  
    • Incorporated: Refers to a "municipal corporation" which is a political subdivision composed of citizens and a geographic area. In this article's case it may be a village, town, or city. 
    • Urban Designation: The official title of "unincorporated", "village", "town", or "city".
    • Primary Predecessor Municipality: The dominant municipality that is usually thought of as absorbing other municipalities through the process of amalgamation. Typically the name of the dominant municipality is retained. 

    8 References


    To keep things neat and manageable, I utilize one universal reference list for all of my population and architecture related articles: Reference List for Population Data and Architecture Articles

    Thursday, 3 April 2014

    The Population of Every Urban Centre in the World with more than 100,000 Inhabitants in the Year 1900

    Contents


    1 Introduction
    2 Methods of Collection
    3 Legend
    4 Population Data
    5 Observations
    • 5.1 Number of Urban Centres per Country
    • 5.2 Number of Urban Centres by Modern Day Political Divisions
    • 5.3 Number of Urban Centres per Continent
    • 5.4 Compared to Today's Population Data (City Proper)
    • 5.5 Compared to Today's Urban Population Data (Urban Amalgamation)
    • 5.6 An Interactive Map of the Urban Centres
    6 Further Reading and Related Articles
    7 References

    1 Introduction


    (Note: I'm currently in the process of updating and revising this article c. 18/07/2014
    Reference numbers being updated as of 14/10/2014)

    The further back in time you go the more difficult it is to find reliable comprehensive sources of populations data. I've an interest in how the world was in the year 1900 & I've been collecting this data since around 2011. Every now & then I've been releasing some of the data I've collected to the public (Canada + USA communities with more than 5,000 people in 1900). Much of it I haven't released since it is not complete but I suppose it may never be. In the list included in this article I've attempted to display all the cities in the world that had a population of more than 100,000 inhabitants in the year 1900. 


    Stanford, E. (1900). Stanford's Library Map of the World on Merctor's Projection. Retrieved from the David Rumsey Collection


    2 Methods of Collection


    Population data from different sources will vary due to different methods used to calculate the population. For instance, some may quote official figures from 1900, others may calculate how many people once lived within the contemporary boundaries of the city today. Others may estimate or try to overcome potential inaccuracies that might be present in what figures we have available today from the past. Some may include or exclude suburbs. 

    The bulk of the data in this article came from three sources. Biguzzi, A. (2013) World city pop. [1], Rand McNally and Company. (1903). Rand McNally & Co.'s Enlarged Business Atlas and Shippers' Guide., [2] and Lahmeyer, J. (2006). Population statistics. [3]. First I collected from sources 1 and 3, then I supplemented them with data from the indices of Rand McNally's 1903 atlas which cites population figures.

    The data used for the American urban centres came from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1900). [4]. It appears to be a complete source of information for the majority of the American urban centres.

    The data collected for the British Empire came from Darling & son Ltd (1901). Census of the British Empire. [5]. Since Britain and its dominions did censuses during the second year of each decade opposed to the USA which did them during the first year, the population data for the British Empire is for 1901 opposed to 1900 for the USA and in many other places.

    If any of my population data isn't from 1900 or 1901 I indicate the closest year I could find in brackets beside the population figure. Sometimes I include an interesting population related note in the brackets as well. If you happen to know of any sources of data that would be great to add to my collection please let me know!


    3 Legend


    • Underlined: The city is still part of the same country today as it was in 1900. Therefore it likely was not part of a colony. If it is no longer part of the same country as 1900 I include in brackets the current name of the country it is presently found in. 
    • Bold: Capital City; I don't differentiate if it used to be a capital or has only become a capital in more recent history. 
    • Top 9 countries with the most urban centres are colour coded as follows (included is the population in 1900 and the number of urban centres):

      British Empire - 419,920,000 - 83
      United States
       - 76,212,168 - 40
      Germany
       - 56,000,000 - 31
      Qing Dynasty (China) - 415,001,488 - 25
      Russian Empire
       - 132,000,000 - 19
      French Empire - 76,090,000 - 19
      Italy
       - 32,000,000 - 11
      Austria-Hungary
       - 51,356,465 - 9
      Ottoman Empire 
       - 30,860,000 - 9
    • At the end of each line I indicate [reference numbers] that correspond to the articles listed in the final "References" section.


    4 Population Data


    Again, this is a work in progress so from time to time I'll be updating the data as I find new information. Information last updated: 03/07/2014


    1. London, England, UK: 4,670,177 [x] 4,536,541 [5] 4,536,063 [2]
    2. New York City, New York, USA: 3,437,202 [4]
    3. Paris, France: 2,714,068
    4. Berlin, Germany: 1,888,848
    5. Vienna, Austria-Hungary (Austria): 1,769,137 1,635,647 [2]
    6. Chicago, Illinois, USA: 1,698,575 [4]
    7. Edo/Yedo (Tokyo), Japan: 1,497,000
    8. Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire (Russia): 1,439,400
    9. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: 1,293,697 [4]
    10. Moskow (Moscow), Russian Empire (Russia): 1,170,000
    11. Calcutta (Kolkata), India: 1,026,900 [1] 847,796 [5]
    12. Peking (Beijing), China: 1,000,000 [1]
    13. Oosaka (Osaka), Japan: 970,000
    14. Buenos Ayres (Buenos Aires), Argentina: 950,891 663,854 [2]
    15. Constantinople (Istanbul), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 942,900
    16. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 811,443 522,651 [2]
    17. Bombay (Mumbai), India: 776,006 [5]
    18. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: 761,709 [5] [2]
    19. Warsaw, Russian Empire (Poland): 756,400
    20. Tien-Tsin (Tianjin), China: 750,000
    21. Budapest, Austria-Hungary (Hungary), 733,358 505,763 [2]
    22. Hamburg, Germany: 705,738
    23. Liverpool, England, UK: 684,958 [5] [2]
    24. Foochow (Fuzhou), China: 630,000
    25. Brussels, Belgium: 626,000 570,844 [2, excludes suburbs]
    26. Chung-king (Chongqing), China: 620,000
    27. Shanghae (Shanghai), China: 619,000
    28. Copenhagen, Denmark: 600,000 375,251 [2]
    29. Cairo, Ottoman/British Empires (Egypt): 600,000 [5]
    30. Canton (Guangzhou), China: 585,000 [1]
    31. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: 575,238 [4]
    32. Naples, Italy: 563,500
    33. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: 560,892 [4]
    34. Manchester, England, UK: 543,872 [5] [2]
    35. Madrid, Spain: 539,800
    36. Barcelona, Spain: 530,300
    37. Birmingham, England, UK: 522,204 [5] [2]
    38. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 510,000
    39. Madras (Chennai), India: 509,300 [5]
    40. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: 508,957 [4]
    41. Munich, Germany: 499,000
    42. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: 496,079 [5]
    43. Marseille, France: 491,200
    44. Milan, Italy: 491,500
    45. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: 487,932 [5]
    46. Rome, Italy: 462,800
    47. Leipzig, Germany: 456,100
    48. Wuhan, China: 450,000
    49. Odessa, Russian Empire (Ukraine): 449,000
    50. Hyderabad, India: 448,500 [5]
    51. Lyon, France: 441,800
    52. Leeds, England, UK: 428,968 [5] [2]
    53. Breslau (Wroclaw), Germany (Poland): 422,700
    54. Mexico City, Mexico: 400,000
    55. Dresden, Germany: 396,100
    56. Cleveland, Ohio, USA: 381,768 [4]
    57. Sheffield, England, UK: 380,793 [5] [2]
    58. Cologne, Germany: 372,500
    59. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 368,000
    60. Kyoto, Japan: 362,000
    61. Lisbon, Portugal: 356,000
    62. Buffalo, New York, USA: 352,387 [4]
    63. Hangchow (Hangzhou), China: 350,000
    64. Belfast, Ireland (Northern Ireland), UK: 348,965 [5] [2] [1.]
    65. Łódź, Russian Empire (Poland): 351,600
    66. San Francisco,California, USA: 342,782 [4]
    67. Turin, Italy: 335,700
    68. Bristol, England, UK: 328,945 [5] [2]
    69. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA: 325,902 [4]
    70. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: 321,616 [4]
    71. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: 316,837 [5] [2]
    72. Alexandria, Ottoman/British Empires (Egypt): 314,000 [5]
    73. Palermo, Italy: 309,700
    74. Stockholm, Sweden-Norway (Sweden): 300,000
    75. Bangkok, Siam (Thailand): 300,000
    76. Ching tu (Chengdu), China: ~300,000 (400,000 in 1911)
    77. Santiago, Chile: 296,600 256,413 [2]
    78. Riga, Russian Empire (Latvia): 294,000
    79. Dublin, Ireland, UK: 289,108 [5] [2] [1.]
    80. Frankfurt, Germany: 288,989
    81. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: 287,104 [4]
    82. Detroit, Michigan, USA: 285,704 [4]
    83. Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA: 285,315 [4]
    84. Hong Kong, (China): 283,978 [5]
    85. Soochow (Suzhou), China: 280,000
    86. Bradford, England, UK: 279,767 [5] [2]
    87. Washington, DC, USA: 278,718 [4]
    88. Antwerp, Belgium: 275,100 282,018 [2]
    89. Nanking (Nanjing), China: 270,000
    90. Montevideo, Uruguay: 268,000 252,000 [2]
    91. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: 267,730 [5]
    92. West Ham, England, UK: 267,358 [5] [2]
    93. Lucknow, India: 264,000 [5]
    94. Nuremberg, Germany: 261,100
    95. Bordeaux, France: 257,500
    96. Ningpo (Ningbo), China: 257,000
    97. Sian (Xi'an), China: 250,000
    98. Kiev, Russian Empire (Ukraine): 247,700 (1897)
    99. Newark, New Jersey, USA: 246,070 [4]
    100. Bucharest, Roumania (Romania): 246,033
    101. Kingston-upon-Hull, England, UK: 240,259 [5] [2]
    102. Sao Paulo, Brazil: 239,820 174,442 [2]
    103. Nottingham, England, UK: 239,743 [5] [2]
    104. Havana, Cuba: 235,981
    105. Hannover (Hanover), Germany: 235,600
    106. Rangoon (Yangôn), India (Burmah/Burma/Myanmar234,881 [5]
    107. Genoa, Italy: 234,700
    108. Changsha, China: 230,000
    109. Magdeburg, Germany: 229,700
    110. Christiania (Oslo), Sweden-Norway (Norway): 227,000
    111. Salford, England, UK: 220,957 [5] [2]
    112. Valencia, Spain: 215,700
    113. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, UK: 215,328 [5] [2]
    114. Düsseldorf, Germany: 213,700
    115. Leicester, England, UK: 211,579 [5] [2]
    116. Lille, France: 210,700
    117. Stettin (Szczecin), Germany (Poland): 210,700
    118. Benares (Vârânasi), India: 209,300 [5]
    119. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: 208,040 [5]
    120. Delhi, India: 207,000 [5]
    121. Chemnitz, Germany: 206,900
    122. Jersey City, New Jersey, USA: 206,433 [4]
    123. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil: 205,813 [3] 174,412 [2] 181,933 [1]
    124. Florence, Italy: 205,600
    125. Louisville, Kentucky, USA: 204,731 [4]
    126. Lahore, India (Pakistan): 203,000 [5]
    127. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: 202,718 [4]
    128. Smyrna (Izmir), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 201,000
    129. Prague, Austria-Hungary (Czech Republic): 200,000 184,109 [2]
    130. Tebriz (Tabriz), Persia (Iran): 200,000
    131. Tehran, Persia (Iran): 200,000 (15,000 in 1795)
    132. Wusih (Wuxi), China: 200,000
    133. Foshan, China: 200,000
    134. Ghent, Belgium: 198,000 [1] 163,030 [2]
    135. Kanpur, India: 197,200 [5]
    136. Kharkov (Kharkiv), Russian Empire (Ukraine): 197,000
    137. King-ki-Tao (Seoul), Korea (South Korea): 195,000
    138. Yokohama, Japan: 193,800
    139. Singapore, (Singapore): 193,089 [5]
    140. Manila, Philippines: 190,000 [1]
    141. Charlottenburg (Annexed by Berlin), Germany: 189,300
    142. Portsmouth, England, UK: 189,160 [5] [2]
    143. Âgra, India: 188,300 [5]
    144. Königsberg (Kaliningrad), Germany (Russia): 188,000
    145. Ahmadâbâd (Ahmedabad), India: 185,889 [5]
    146. Mandalay, India (Burmah/Burma/Myanmar: 183,800 [5]
    147. Haag (The Hague), The Netherlands: 180,000 (1895)
    148. Tashkand (Tashkent), Russian Empire (Uzbekistan): 180,000
    149. Baku, Russian Empire (Azerbaijan): 179,000
    150. Stuttgart, Germany: 176,700
    151. Providence, Rhode Island, USA: 175,597 [4]
    152. Tiflis (Tbilisi), Russian Empire (Georgia): 175,000
    153. Oporto (Porto), Portugal: 172,400
    154. Allahâbâd, India: 172,000 [5]
    155. Venice, Italy: 171,000
    156. Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City), French Indochina (Vietnam): 170,000 [1]
    157. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA: 169,164 [4]
    158. Gratz (Graz), Austria-Hungary (Austria): 168,808 113,540 [2]
    159. Bolton, England, UK: 168,205 [5] [2]
    160. Chinkiang (Zhenjiang), China: 168,000
    161. Damascus, Ottoman Empire (Syria): 165,000
    162. Cardiff, Wales, UK: 164,333 [5] [2]
    163. Kansas City, Missouri, USA: 163,752 [4]
    164. Bremen, Germany: 163,300
    165. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: 163,065 [4]
    166. Rochester, New York, USA: 162,608 [4]
    167. Amritsir (Amritsar), India: 162,500 [5]
    168. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: 162,261 [5]
    169. Vilna (Vilnius), Russian Empire (Lithuania): 162,600
    170. Altona (Annexed by Hamburg), Germany: 161,500
    171. Kôbe, Japan: 161,100
    172. Dundee, Scotland, UK: 161,000 [5] [2]
    173. Bangalore, India: 161,000 [5]
    174. Jypoor (Jaipur), India: 160,200 [5]
    175. Mukden (Shenyang), China: 160,000
    176. Lemberg (Lviv), Austria-Hungary (Ukraine): 159,000 [1] 128,419 [2]
    177. Liège, Belgium: 157,800 171,031 [2]
    178. Hâora (Howrah - twin city with Kolkata), India: 157,594 [5]
    179. Elberfeld (Wuppertal), Germany: 157,000
    180. Halle (Saale), Germany: 156,600
    181. Tunis, Tunisia (French Empire): 156,000
    182. Johannesburg, South Africa: 155,642 (1904) [5]
    183. Poonah (Pune), India: 154,000 [5]
    184. Colombo, Sri Lanka: 153,691 [5]
    185. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK: 153,114 [5] [2]
    186. Bologna, Italy: 152,000
    187. Strasbourg, Germany (France): 151,000
    188. Zürich, Switzerland: 150,700
    189. Nangasaki (Nagasaki), Japan: 150,000
    190. Nanchang, China: 150,000
    191. Ibadan, Nigeria: 150,000 [5]
    192. Kai-fong (Kaifeng), China: 150,000
    193. Bagdad (Baghdad), Ottoman Empire (Iraq): 150,000
    194. Toulouse, France: 149,800
    195. Messina, Italy: 149,800
    196. Catania, Italy: 149,300
    197. Cape Town, South Africa: 148,000 [5]
    198. Seville, Spain: 147,300
    199. Surabaya, Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 146,900
    200. Saint-Étienne, France: 146,600
    201. Sunderland, England, UK: 146,565 [5] [2]
    202. Valparaiso, Chile: 145,000 122,447 [2]
    203. Saratov, Russian Empire (Russia): 143,000
    204. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Empire (Russia): 142,000
    205. Dortmund, Germany: 142,000
    206. Barmen (Wuppertal), Germany: 141,900
    207. Mannheim, Germany: 141,100
    208. Danzig (Gdansk), Germany (Poland): 140,600
    209. Algiers, Algeria (French Empire): 140,000
    210. Salonica (Thessaloniki), Ottoman Empire (Greece): 140,000
    211. Gwalior, India: 139,000 [5]
    212. Gelsenkirchen, Germany: 138,000
    213. Oldham, England, UK: 137,238 [5] [2]
    214. Brunn (Brno), Austria-Hungary (Czech Republic): 137,000 [1]
    215. Tsinan (Jinan), China: 135,000
    216. Ekaterinoslav (Dnipropetrovsk), Russian Empire (Ukraine): 135,000
    217. Patna, India: 134,800 [5]
    218. Croydon, England, UK: 133,885 [5] [2]
    219. Denver, Colorado, USA: 133,859 [4]
    220. Nantes, France: 133,000
    221. Aachen, Germany: 132,200
    222. Trieste, Austria-Hungary (Italy): 132,000 [1] 158,344 [2]
    223. Toledo, Ohio, USA: 131,822 [4]
    224. Nagoya, Japan: 131,500
    225. Bareilly, India: 131,200 [5]
    226. Málaga, Spain: 131,100
    227. Gottenburg (Gothenburg), Sweden-Norway (Sweden): 130,600
    228. Le Havre, France: 130,200
    229. Kazan, Russian Empire (Russia): 131,500
    230. Allegheny, Pennsylvania, USA: 129,896 [4]
    231. Braunschweig (Brunswick), Germany: 128,200
    232. Astrakhan, Russian Empire (Russia): 128,000
    233. Nagpoor (Nâgpur), India: 127,700 [5]
    234. Blackburn, England, UK: 127,527 [5] [2]
    235. Halab (Aleppo), Ottoman Empire (Syria): 127,200
    236. Kichenau (Chisinau), Russian Empire (Moldova): 125,800
    237. Columbus, Ohio, USA: 125,560 [4]
    238. Roubaix, France: 124,400
    239. Brighton, England, UK: 123,478 [5] [2]
    240. Athens, Greece: 123,000 (1896) (4,000 in 1833)
    241. Kashmir (Srînagar), India: 122,600 [5]
    242. Hiroshima, Japan: 122,300 (1898)
    243. Lima, Peru: 122,000 100,000 [2]
    244. Kirinula (Jilin City), China: 120,000
    245. Bogota, Colombia: 120,000 [2] [3] | 105,000 [1] | 110,000
    246. Medina (Marrakech/Marrakesh), Morocco: 120,000
    247. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: 119,428 [5]
    248. Sûrat, India: 119,300 [5]
    249. Essen, Germany: 118,900
    250. Bairut (Beirut), Ottoman Empire (Lebanon): 118,800
    251. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA: 118,421 [4]
    252. Meerut, India: 118,100 [5]
    253. Posan (Poznan), Germany (Poland): 117,000
    254. Rouen, France: 116,300
    255. Batavia (Jakarta) Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 115,000 [1]
    256. Willesden, England, UK: 114,815 [5] [2]
    257. Geneva, Switzerland: 114,500
    258. Karachi, India (Pakistan): 114,000 [1] [5]
    259. Rhondda, Wales, UK: 113,735 [5] [2]
    260. Recife, Brazil: 113,100 111,556 [2]
    261. Preston, England, UK: 112,982 [5] [2]
    262. Rosario, Argentina: 112,462 91,669 [2]
    263. Norwich, England, UK: 111,728 [5] [2]
    264. Birkenhead, England, UK: 110,926 [5] [2]
    265. Lanchu (Lanzhou), China: 110,000
    266. Tula, Russian Empire (Russia): 110,000
    267. Gateshead, England, UK: 109,887 [5] [2]
    268. Basel, Switzerland: 109,800
    269. Surakarta (Solo), Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 109,500
    270. Reims, France: 108,400
    271. Syracuse, New York, USA: 108,374 [4]
    272. New Haven, Connecticut, USA: 108,027 [4]
    273. Krakow, Austria-Hungary (Poland): 108,000 [1]
    274. Kiel, Germany: 108,000
    275. Fez (Fes), Morocco: 108,000
    276. Plymwouth, England, UK: 107,509 [5] [2]
    277. Crefeld (Krefeld), Germany: 106,900
    278. Madura (Madurai), India: 106,000 [5]
    279. Kassel, Germany: 106,000
    280. Derby, England, UK: 105,785 [5] [2]
    281. Paterson, New Jersey, USA: 105,171 [4]
    282. Nice, France: 105,109 (1901)
    283. Halifax, England, UK: 104,933 [5] [2]
    284. Southampton, England, UK: 104,911 [5] [2]
    285. Fall River, Massachusetts, USA: 104,863 [4]
    286. Tanjore (Tiruchchirâppalli/Trichinopoly), India: 104,700 [5]
    287. Baroda (Vadodara), India: 103,800 [5]
    288. Ha nôi (Hanoi), French Indochina (Vietnam): 103,200
    289. St. Joseph, Missouri, USA: 102,979 [4]
    290. Nancy, France: 102,600
    291. Omaha, Nebraska, USA: 102,555 [4]
    292. Tottenham, England, UK: 102,519 [5] [2]
    293. Los Angeles, California, USA: 102,479 [4]
    294. Memphis, Tennessee, USA: 102,320 [4]
    295. Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA: 102,026 [4]
    296. Utrecht, The Netherlands: 102,000
    297. Toulon, France: 101,600
    298. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico: 101,200
    299. Szeged (Szegedin), Austria-Hungary (Hungary): 100,300 87,410 [2]
    300. Xiamen, China: 100,000
    301. Guiyang, China: 100,000

    5 Observations


    5.1 Number of Urban Centres per Country


    The table below shows the number of urban centres per country that had more than 100,000 inhabitants in the year 1900. It also shows the population. These numbers also reflect the number of cities within each country's colonial empire. Only the top 9 countries with the most urban centres are colour coded. Top 10 urban centres are included below. 
    1. British Empire - 419,920,000 - 83
      1. London, England, UK: 4,670,177 [x] 4,536,541 [5] 4,536,063 [2]
      2. Calcutta (Kolkata), India: 1,026,900 [1] 847,796 [5]
      3. Bombay (Mumbai), India776,006 [5]
      4. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: 761,709
      [5] [2]
      5. Liverpool, England, UK: 684,958 [5] [2]
      6. Cairo, Ottoman/British Empires (Egypt): 600,000 [5]
      7. Manchester, England, UK: 543,872 [5] [2]
      8. Birmingham, England, UK: 522,204 [5] [2]
      9. Madras (Chennai), India: 509,300 [5]
      10. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: 496,079 [5]
    2. United States - 76,212,168 - 40
      1. New York City, New York, USA: 3,437,202 [4]
      2. Chicago, Illinois, USA: 1,698,575 [4]
      3. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: 1,293,697 [4]
      4. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: 575,238
      [4]
      5. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: 560,892 [4]
      6. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: 508,957 [4]
      7. Cleveland, Ohio, USA: 381,768 [4]
      8. Buffalo, New York, USA: 352,387 [4]
      9. San Francisco,California, USA: 342,782 [4]
      10. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA: 325,902 [4]
    3. Germany - 56,000,000 - 31
      1. Berlin, Germany: 1,888,848
      2. Hamburg, Germany: 705,738

      3. Munich, Germany: 499,000
      4. Leipzig, Germany: 456,100
      5. Breslau (Wroclaw), Germany (Poland): 422,700
      6. Dresden, Germany: 396,100
      7. Cologne, Germany: 372,500
      8. Frankfurt, Germany: 288,989
      9. Nuremberg, Germany: 261,100
      10. Hannover (Hanover), Germany: 235,600
    4. Qing Dynasty (China) - 415,001,488 - 25
      1. Peking (Beijing), China: 1,000,000 [1]
      2. Tien-Tsin (Tianjin), China: 750,000

      3. Foochow (Fuzhou), China: 630,000
      4. Chung-king (Chongqing), China: 620,000
      5. Shanghae (Shanghai), China: 619,000
      6. Canton (Guangzhou), China: 585,000 [1]
      7. Wuhan, China: 450,000
      8. Hangchow (Hangzhou), China: 350,000
      9. Ching tu (Chengdu), China: ~300,000 (400,000 in 1911)
      10. Soochow (Suzhou), China: 280,000
    5. Russian Empire - 132,000,000 - 19
      1. Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire (Russia): 1,439,400
      2. Moskow (Moscow), Russian Empire (Russia): 1,170,000
      3. Warsaw, Russian Empire (Poland): 756,400

      4. Odessa, Russian Empire (Ukraine): 449,000
      5. Łódź, Russian Empire (Poland): 351,600
      6. Riga, Russian Empire (Latvia): 294,000
      7. Kiev, Russian Empire (Ukraine): 247,700 (1897)
      8. Kharkov (Kharkiv), Russian Empire (Ukraine): 197,000
      9. Tashkand (Tashkent), Russian Empire (Uzbekistan): 180,000
      10. Baku, Russian Empire (Azerbaijan): 179,000
    6. French Empire - 76,090,000 - 19
      1. Paris, France: 2,714,068
      2. Marseille, France: 491,200

      3. Lyon, France: 441,800
      4. Bordeaux, France: 257,500
      5. Lille, France: 210,700
      6. Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City), French Indochina (Vietnam): 170,000 [1]
      7. Tunis, Tunisia (French Empire): 156,000 [1]
      8. Toulouse, France: 149,800
      9. Saint-Étienne, France: 146,600
      10. Algiers, Algeria (French Empire): 140,000
    7. Italy - 32,000,000 - 11
      1. Naples, Italy: 563,500

      2. Milan, Italy: 491,500
      3. Rome, Italy: 462,800
      4. Turin, Italy: 335,700
      5. Palermo, Italy: 309,700
      6. Genoa, Italy: 234,700
      7. Florence, Italy: 205,600

      8. Venice, Italy: 171,000
      9. Bologna, Italy: 152,000
      10. Messina, Italy: 149,800
    8. Austria-Hungary - 51,356,465 - 9
      1. Vienna, Austria-Hungary (Austria): 1,769,137 1,635,647 [2]
      2. Budapest, Austria-Hungary (Hungary), 733,358
       505,763 [2]
      3. Prague, Austria-Hungary (Czech Republic): 200,000 184,109 [2]
      4. Gratz (Graz), Austria-Hungary (Austria): 168,808 113,540 [2]
      5. Lemberg (Lviv), Austria-Hungary (Ukraine): 159,000
       [1] 128,419 [2]
      6. Brunn (Brno), Austria-Hungary (Czech Republic): 137,000 [1]
      7. Trieste, Austria-Hungary (Italy): 132,000 [1] 158,344 [2]
      8. Krakow, Austria-Hungary (Poland): 108,000 [1]
      9. Szeged (Szegedin), Austria-Hungary (Hungary): 100,300 87,410 [2]
    9. Ottoman Empire - 30,860,000 - 9
      1. Constantinople (Istanbul), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 942,900

      2. Cairo, Ottoman/British Empires
       (Egypt): 600,000 [5]
      3. Alexandria, Ottoman/British Empires (Egypt): 314,000 [5]
      4. Smyrna (Izmir), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 201,000
      5. Damascus, Ottoman Empire (Syria): 165,000
      6. Bagdad (Baghdad), Ottoman Empire (Iraq): 150,000
      7. Salonica (Thessaloniki), Ottoman Empire (Greece): 140,000
      8. Halab (Aleppo), Ottoman Empire (Syria): 127,200
      9. Bairut (Beirut), Ottoman Empire (Lebanon): 118,800
    10. Japan - 42,000,000 - 8
      1. Edo/Yedo (Tokyo), Japan: 1,497,000
      2. Oosaka (Osaka), Japan: 970,000
      3. Kyoto, Japan: 362,000

      4. Yokohama, Japan: 193,800
      5. Kôbe, Japan: 161,100
      6. Nangasaki (Nagasaki), Japan: 150,000
      7. Nagoya, Japan: 131,500
      8. Hiroshima, Japan: 122,300 (1898)
    11. Dutch Empire - 51,246,000 - 7
      1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 510,000

      2. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 368,000
      3. Haag (The Hague), The Netherlands: 180,000 (1895)
      4. Surabaya, Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 146,900
      5. Batavia (Jakarta) Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 115,000 [1]
      6. Surakarta, Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 109,500
      7. Utrecht, The Netherlands: 102,000
    12. Spain - 20,750,000 - 5
      1. Madrid, Spain: 539,800

      2. Barcelona, Spain: 530,300
      3. Valencia, Spain: 215,700
      4. Seville, Spain: 147,300
      5. 
      Málaga, Spain: 131,100
    13. Brazil - 17,000,000 - 4
      1. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 811,443
       522,651 [2]
      2. Sao Paulo, Brazil: 239,820 174,442 [2]
      3. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil: 205,813 [3] 174,412 [2] 181,933 [1]
      4. 
      Recife, Brazil: 113,100
       111,556 [2]
    14. Belgium - 6,136,000 - 4
      1. Brussels, Belgium: 626,000
       570,844 [2, excludes suburbs]
      2. Antwerp, Belgium: 275,100 282,018 [2]
      3. Ghent, Belgium: 198,000 [1] 163,030 [2]
      4. 
      Liège, Belgium: 157,800 171,031 [2]
    15. Sweden-Norway - 7,560,000 - 3
      1. Stockholm, Sweden-Norway (Sweden): 300,000
      2. Christiania (Oslo), Sweden-Norway (Norway): 227,000
      3. 
      Gottenburg (Gothenburg), Sweden-Norway (Sweden): 130,600
    16. Switzerland - 3,525,300 - 3
      1. Zü
      rich, Switzerland: 150,700
      2. Geneva, Switzerland: 114,500

      3. 
      Basel, Switzerland: 109,800
    17. Persia (Iran) - 7,000,000 - 2
      1. Tebriz (Tabriz), Persia (Iran): 200,000
      2. 
      Tehran, Persia (Iran): 200,000 (15,000 in 1795)
    18. Portuguese Empire - 12,434,000 - 2 (All within Portugal)
      1. Lisbon, Portugal: 356,000

      2. Oporto (Porto), Portugal: 172,400
    19. Chile - 2,867,000 - 2
      1. Santiago, Chile: 296,600 256,413 [2]
      2. 
      Valparaiso, Chile: 145,000
       122,447 [2]
    20. Mexico - 12,050,000 - 2
      1. Mexico City, Mexico: 400,000

      2. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico: 101,200
    21. Argentina - 5,800,000 - 2
      1. Buenos Ayres (Buenos Aires), Argentina: 950,891
       663,854 [2]
      2. 
      Rosario, Argentina: 112,462 
      91,669 [2]
    22. Morocco - 4,162,000 - 2
      1. Fez (Fes), Morocco: 108,000
      2. Medina (Marrakech/Marrakesh), Morocco: 120,000
    23. Greece - 2,800,000 - 1
      1. 
      Athens, Greece: 123,000 (1896) (4,000 in 1833)
    24. Denmark - 2,182,000 - 1
      1. 
      Copenhagen, Denmark: 600,000
       375,251 [2]
    25. Korea - 12,000,000 - 1
      1. 
      King-ki-Tao (Seoul), Korea (South Korea): 195,000
    26. Siam (Thailand) - 7,200,000 - 1
      1. 
      Bangkok, Siam (Thailand): 300,000
    27. Roumania (Romania) - 6,630,000 - 1
      1. 
      Bucharest, Roumania (Romania): 246,033
    28. Uruguay - 1,026,000 - 1
      1. 
      Montevideo, Uruguay: 268,000
       252,000 [2]
    29. Peru - 3,700,000 - 1
      1. 
      Lima, Peru: 122,000
       100,000 [2]
    30. Colombia - 4,604,000 - 1
      1. 
      Bogota, Colombia:
       120,000 [2] [3] | 105,000 [1] | 110,000

    An interesting observation is how only two of the cities in the Russian Empire's top ten are still part of Russia today. 



    A pie chart showing the number of urban centres per country with a population of more than 100,000 inhabitants in the year 1900.



    5.2 Number of Urban Centres by Modern Day Political Divisions


    It's an interesting perspective to rank by modern day political divisions. The following table is ranked by the number of urban centres per modern political division and includes a list of the top ten. I include the same colour coding as used in the rest of this article to indicate if the predecessor state that had sovereignty over the city was part of the top 9 containing the most urban centres in 1900.

    1. United States: 38
      1. New York City, New York, USA: 3,437,202 [4]
      2. Chicago, Illinois, USA: 1,698,575 [4]
      3. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: 1,293,697 [4]
      4. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: 575,238
      [4]
      5. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: 560,892 [4]
      6. Baltimore, Maryland, USA: 508,957 [4]
      7. Cleveland, Ohio, USA: 381,768 [4]
      8. Buffalo, New York, USA: 352,387 [4]
      9. San Francisco,California, USA: 342,782 [4]
      10. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA: 325,902 [4]
    2. United Kingdom: 38
      1. London, England, UK: 4,670,177 [x] 4,536,541 [5] 4,536,063 [2]
      2. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: 761,709
      [5] [2]
      3. Liverpool, England, UK: 684,958 [5] [2]
      4. Manchester, England, UK: 543,872 [5] [2]
      5. Birmingham, England, UK: 522,204 [5] [2]
      6. Leeds, England, UK: 428,968 [5] [2]
      7. Sheffield, England, UK: 380,793 [5] [2]
      8. Belfast, Ireland (Northern Ireland), UK: 348,965 [5] [2] [1.]
      9. Bristol, England, UK: 328,945 [5] [2]
      10. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: 316,837 [5] [2]
    3. Germany: 29
      1. Berlin, Germany: 1,888,848
      2. Hamburg, Germany: 705,738

      3. Munich, Germany: 499,000
      4. Leipzig, Germany: 456,100
      5. Dresden, Germany: 396,100
      6. Cologne, Germany: 372,500
      7. Frankfurt, Germany: 288,989
      8. Nuremberg, Germany: 261,100
      9. Hannover (Hanover), Germany: 235,600
      10. Magdeburg, Germany: 229,700
    4. India: 27
      1. Calcutta (Kolkata), India: 1,026,900 [1] 847,796 [5]
      2. Bombay (Mumbai), India776,006 [5]
      3. Madras (Chennai), India: 509,300
      [5]
      4. Hyderabad, India: 448,500 [5]
      5. Lucknow, India: 264,000 [5]
      6. Benares (Vârânasi), India: 209,300 [5]
      7. Delhi, India: 207,000 [5]
      8. Kanpur, India: 197,200 [5]
      9. Agra, India: 188,300 [5]
      10. Ahmadâbâd (Ahmedabad), India: 185,900 [5]
    5. China: 26
      1. Peking (Beijing), China: 1,000,000 [1]
      2. 
      Tien-Tsin (Tianjin), China: 750,000

      3. Foochow (Fuzhou), China: 630,000
      4. Chung-king (Chongqing), China: 620,000
      5. 
      Shanghae (Shanghai), China: 619,000
      6. Canton (Guangzhou), China: 585,000 [1]
      7. Wuhan, China: 450,000
      8. Hangchow (Hangzhou), China: 350,000
      9. Ching tu (Chengdu), China: ~300,000 (400,000 in 1911)
      10. Hong Kong, (China): 283,978 [5]
    6. France: 16
      1. Paris, France: 2,714,068
      2. Marseille, France: 491,200

      3. Lyon, France: 441,800
      4. Bordeaux, France: 257,500
      5. Lille, France: 210,700

      6. Toulouse, France: 149,800
      7. Saint-Étienne, France: 146,600
      8. Nantes, France: 133,000
      9. Le Havre, France: 130,200
      10. Roubaix, France: 124,400
    7. Italy: 12
      1. Naples, Italy: 563,500

      2. Milan, Italy: 491,500
      3. Rome, Italy: 462,800
      4. Turin, Italy: 335,700
      5. Palermo, Italy: 309,700
      6. Genoa, Italy: 234,700
      7. Florence, Italy: 205,600
      8. Venice, Italy: 171,000
      9. Bologna, Italy: 152,000
      10. Messina, Italy: 149,800
    8. Russia: 8
      1. Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire (Russia): 1,439,400
      2. Moskow (Moscow), Russian Empire (Russia): 1,170,000 
      3. Königsberg (Kaliningrad), Germany (Russia): 188,000
      4. Saratov, Russian Empire (Russia): 143,000

      5. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Empire (Russia): 142,000
      6. Kazan, Russian Empire (Russia): 131,500
      7. Astrakhan, Russian Empire (Russia): 128,000
      8. Tula, Russian Empire (Russia): 110,000 
    9. Japan: 8
      1. Edo/Yedo (Tokyo), Japan: 1,497,000
      2. Oosaka (Osaka), Japan: 970,000
      3. Kyoto, Japan: 362,000

      4. Yokohama, Japan: 193,800
      5. Kôbe, Japan: 161,100
      6. Nangasaki (Nagasaki), Japan: 150,000
      7. Nagoya, Japan: 131,500
      8. Hiroshima, Japan: 122,300 (1898)
    10. Poland: 7
      1. Warsaw, Russian Empire (Poland): 756,400
      2. Breslau (Wroclaw), Germany (Poland): 422,700

      3. Łódź, Russian Empire (Poland): 351,600
      4. Stettin (Szczecin), Germany (Poland): 210,700
      5. Danzig (Gdansk), Germany (Poland): 140,600
      6. Posan (Poznan), Germany (Poland): 117,000
      7. Krakow, Austria-Hungary (Poland): 108,000 [1]
    11. Spain: 5
      1. Madrid, Spain: 539,800

      2. Barcelona, Spain: 530,300
      3. Valencia, Spain: 215,700
      4. Seville, Spain: 147,300
      5. Málaga, Spain: 131,100
    12. Ukraine: 5
      1. Odessa, Russian Empire (Ukraine): 449,000

      2. Kiev, Russian Empire (Ukraine): 247,700 (1897)
      3. Kharkov (Kharkiv), Russian Empire (Ukraine): 197,000
      4. Lemberg (Lviv), Austria-Hungary (Ukraine): 159,000 [1] 128,419 [2]
      5. Ekaterinoslav (Dnipropetrovsk), Russian Empire (Ukraine): 135,000
    13. Brazil: 4
      1. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 811,443 522,651 [2]
      2. Sao Paulo, Brazil: 239,820 174,442 [2]
      3. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil: 205,813 [3] 174,412 [2] 181,933 [1]
      4. 
      Recife, Brazil: 113,100
       111,556 [2]
    14. Belgium: 4
      1. Brussels, Belgium: 626,000
       570,844 [2, excludes suburbs]
      2. Antwerp, Belgium: 275,100 282,018 [2]
      3. Ghent, Belgium: 198,000 [1] 163,030 [2]
      4. Liège, Belgium: 157,800 171,031 [2]
    15. The Netherlands: 4
      1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 510,000

      2. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 368,000
      3. Haag (The Hague), The Netherlands: 180,000 (1895)
      4. Utrecht, The Netherlands: 102,000
    16. Australia: 4
      1. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: 496,079
      [5]
      2. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: 487,932 [5]
      3. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: 162,261 [5]
      4. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: 119,428 [5]
    17. Indonesia: 3
      1. Surabaya, Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 146,900
      2. Batavia (Jakarta) Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 115,000 [1]
      3. Surakarta, Dutch East Indies (Indonesia): 109,500
    18. Switzerland: 3
      1. Zürich, Switzerland: 150,700
      2. Geneva, Switzerland: 114,500

      3. 
      Basel, Switzerland: 109,800
    19. Sweden: 2
      1. Stockholm, Sweden-Norway (Sweden): 300,000
      2. Gottenburg (Gothenburg), Sweden-Norway (Sweden): 130,600
    20. Portugal: 2
      1. Lisbon, Portugal: 356,000

      2. Oporto (Porto), Portugal: 172,400
    21. Turkey: 2
      1. Constantinople (Istanbul), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 942,900
      2. Smyrna (Izmir), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 201,000
    22. Iran: 2
      1. Tebriz (Tabriz), Persia (Iran): 200,000
      2. 
      Tehran, Persia (Iran): 200,000 (15,000 in 1795)
    23. Hungary: 2
      1. Budapest, Austria-Hungary (Hungary), 733,358 505,763 [2]
      2. Szeged (Szegedin), Austria-Hungary (Hungary): 100,300
       87,410 [2]
    24. Austria: 2
      1. Vienna, Austria-Hungary (Austria): 1,769,137 1,635,647 [2]
      2. Gratz (Graz), Austria-Hungary (Austria): 168,808
       113,540 [2]
    25. Argentina: 2
      1. Buenos Ayres (Buenos Aires), Argentina: 950,891 663,854 [2]
      2. 
      Rosario, Argentina: 112,462
       91,669 [2]
    26. Egypt: 2
      1. Cairo, Ottoman/British Empires
       (Egypt): 600,000 [5]
      2. Alexandria, Ottoman/British Empires (Egypt): 314,000 [5]
    27. Mexico: 2
      1. Mexico City, Mexico: 400,000

      2. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico: 101,200
    28. Myanmar: 2
      1. Rangoon (Yangôn), India (Burmah/Burma/Myanmar): 234,900 [5]
      2. Mandalay, India (Burmah/Burma/Myanmar: 183,800 [5]
    29. Czech Republic: 2
      1. Prague, Austria-Hungary (Czech Republic): 200,000 184,109 [2]
      2. Brunn (Brno), Austria-Hungary (Czech Republic): 137,000
       [1]
    30. Canada: 2
      1. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: 267,730 [5]
      2. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: 208,040
      [5]
    31. Chile: 2
      1. Santiago, Chile: 296,600 256,413 [2]
      2. 
      Valparaiso, Chile: 145,000
       122,447 [2]
    32. Vietnam: 2
      1. Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City), French Indochina (Vietnam): 170,000 [1]
      2. Ha nôi (Hanoi), French Indochina (Vietnam): 103,200
    33. Syria: 2
      1. Damascus, Ottoman Empire (Syria): 165,000
      2. Halab (Aleppo), Ottoman Empire (Syria): 127,200
    34. Greece: 2
      1. Smyrna (Izmir), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 201,000
      2. Athens, Greece: 123,000 (1896) (4,000 in 1833)
    35. South Africa: 2
      1. Johannesburg, South Africa: 155,642 (1904)
      [5]
      2. Cape Town, South Africa: 148,000 [5]
    36. Pakistan: 2
      1. Lahore, India (Pakistan): 203,000 [5]
      2. Karachi, India (Pakistan): 114,000
       [1] [5]
    37. Morocco: 2
      1. Fez (Fes), Morocco: 108,000
      2. Medina (Marrakech/Marrakesh), Morocco: 120,000
    38. Iraq: 1
      1. Bagdad (Baghdad), Ottoman Empire (Iraq): 150,000
    39. Ireland: 1
      1. Dublin, Ireland, UK: 
      289,108 [5] [2] [1.]
    40. Uzbekistan: 1
      1. Tashkand (Tashkent), Russian Empire (Uzbekistan): 180,000
    41. Georgia: 1
      1. Tiflis (Tbilisi), Russian Empire (Georgia): 175,000
    42. Azerbaijan: 1
      1. Baku, Russian Empire (Azerbaijan): 179,000
    43. Norway: 1
      1. Christiania (Oslo), Sweden-Norway (Norway): 227,000
    44. Latvia: 1
      1. Riga, Russian Empire (Latvia): 294,000
    45. Lithuania: 1
      1. Vilna (Vilnius), Russian Empire (Lithuania): 162,600
    46. Algeria: 1
      1. Algiers, Algeria (French Empire): 140,000
    47. Denmark: 1
      1. Copenhagen, Denmark: 600,000
       375,251 [2]
    48. Thailand: 1
      1. Bangkok, Siam (Thailand): 300,000
    49. Romania: 1
      1. Bucharest, Roumania (Romania): 246,033
    50. Uruguay: 1
      1. Montevideo, Uruguay: 268,000
       252,000 [2]
    51. Cuba: 1
      1. Havana, Cuba: 235,981
    52. South Korea: 1
      1. King-ki-Tao (Seoul), Korea (South Korea): 195,000
    53. Singapore: 1
      1. Singapore, (Singapore): 193,089
      [5]
    54. Philippines: 1
      1. Manila, Philippines: 190,000
       [1]
    55. Tunisia: 1
      1. Tunis, Tunisia (French Empire): 156,000
       [1]
    56. Sri Lanka: 1
      1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: 153,691
      [5]
    57. Nigeria: 1
      1. Ibadan, Nigeria: 150,000
      [5]
    58. Moldova: 1
      1. Kichenau (Chisinau), Russian Empire (Moldova): 125,800
    59. Peru: 1
      1. Lima, Peru: 122,000
       100,000 [2]
    60. Lebanon: 1
      1. Bairut (Beirut), Ottoman Empire (Lebanon): 118,800
    61. Colombia: 1
      1. Bogota, Colombia: 120,000
       [2] [3] | 105,000 [1] | 110,000 





    A pie chart showing the number of urban centres with more than 100,000 inhabitants in the year 1900 by modern political divisions. 

    One thing that stand out is how there are twice as many countries constituting the area of the previous countries & empires from 1900. This is largely due to the decline of colonialism & the breakup of larger empires. A number of cities have also shifted from power to power (ex. Konigsberg, Germany is now Kaliningrad, Russia).

    It's also interesting to note how the United Kingdom & the United States have exactly the same number of urban centres over 100,000 inhabitants once you remove their external possessions (the UK's possession of India contributed to a significant number of the British Empire's large cities).

    One point that may surprise people are how many cities in the USA had a population of more than 100,000 in 1900. Although North America is traditionally considered the "New World" from a European perspective it was during the Industrial Revolution that cities really began to grow. By 1900 the second industrial revolution was already well underway. Many of the countries listed above were already highly industrialized with mills, railways, canals, & worker's housing abounding.


    5.3 Number of Urban Centres per Continent


    The table below lists the number of urban centres in the year 1900 with more than 100,000 inhabitants by continent. I also include the population of each continent for the year 1900. Note, I considered Baku, Azerbaijan & Tbilisi, Georgia to be part of Europe in the following table & consequent pie chart. 
    1. Europe: 408,000,000 156
    2. Asia: 947,000,000 83
    3. North America: 106,000,000 43
    4. South America: 38,000,000 12
    5. Africa: 120,000,000 9
    6. Oceania: 6,000,000 4






    A pie chart showing the number of urban centres with more than 100,000 inhabitants by continent.


    5.4 Compared to Today's Population Data (City Proper)


    Below, the populations of the top 20 most populated urban centres in the world in the year 1900 are compared to their c. 2014 populations. For this comparison only official quotes of the city proper is used opposed to metropolitan or urban populations. Latest population data available as of 10th April, 2014. Included in the table below is both the most recent population data & the surface area of the city in kilometres squared.
    1. London, England, UK: 8,308,369 | 1,572.15
    2. New York City, New York, USA: 8,405,837 | 783.84
    3. Paris, France: 2,243,833 | 2,844.8
    4. Berlin, Germany: 3,517,424 | 891.75
    5. Vienna, Austria-Hungary (Austria): 1,765,649 | 414.65
    6. Chicago, Illinois, USA: 2,714,856 | 606.1
    7. Tokyo, Japan: 9,071,577 | 622.99
    8. Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire (Russia): 5,131,967 | 1,439
    9. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: 1,526,006 | 367
    10. Moscow, Russian Empire (Russia): 12,111,194 | 2,510.12
    11. Calcutta (Kolkata), India: 4,486,679 | 185
    12. Beijing, China: 11,716,620 | 1,368.32
    13. Osaka, Japan: 2,666,371 | 223
    14. Buenos Aires, Argentina: 2,890,151 | 203
    15. Constantinople (Istanbul), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 14,160,467 | 2,189.79
    16. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 6,429,923 | 1,200.27
    17. Bombay (Mumbai), India: 12,478,447 | 603.4
    18. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: 595,080 | 175.5
    19. Warsaw, Russian Empire (Poland): 1,715,517 | 517.24
    20. Tianjin, China: 9,341,844 | 4,037



    The chart above compares the populations of the top ten most populated urban centres in the year 1900 with their populations today.



    The chart above compares the populations of the 10-20th most populated urban centres in the year 1900 with their populations today.


    Interestingly, Glasgow's proper population has actually decreased since the year 1900. If more cities were plotted one would also see this occur with other British & American cities. Examples given in the table below. 


    • St. Louis, Missouri: 1900: 575,238 | 2014: 318,416 - Difference = 256,822
    • Liverpool, England: 1900: 684,958 | 2014: 466,415 - Difference = 218,543
    • Glasgow, Scotland: 1900: 761,709 | 2014: 595,080 - Difference = 166,629
    • Buffalo, New York: 1900: 352,387 | 2014: 259,384 - Difference = 93,003
    • Manchester, England: 1900: 543,872: 2014: 502,900 - Difference = 40,972
    • Cincinnati, Ohio: 1900: 325,902 | 2014: 296,943 - Difference = 28,959
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: 1900: 321,616 | 2014: 306,211 - Difference = 15,405

    Much of the decrease is due to suburbanization, deindustrialization, & a number of other factors (I go into more detail about these processes in one of my previous blog posts). Although the city proper populations have decreased, urban amalgamation populations have not. This is illustrated by the data in the next section. 

    5.5 Compared to Today's Urban Population Data (Urban Amalgamation)


    Below, the populations of the top 20 most populated urban centres in the world in the year 1900 are compared to their c. 2014 urban populations. For this comparison the largest urban area (ie including the metropolitan area & commuter towns) is used. In the table below the surface area is not included because reliable information was not available.

    1. London, England, UK: 15,010,295
    2. New York City, New York, USA: 20,673,000
    3. Paris, France: 10,869,000
    4. Berlin, Germany: 3,401,147
    5. Vienna, Austria-Hungary (Austria): 2,419,000
    6. Chicago, Illinois, USA: 9,522,434
    7. Tokyo, Japan: 37,239,000
    8. Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire: 4,899,000
    9. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: 6,018,800
    10. Moscow, Russian Empire: 15,788,999
    11. Calcutta (Kolkata), India: 14,630,000
    12. Beijing, China: 21,150,000
    13. Osaka, Japan: 18,768,395
    14. Buenos Aires, Argentina: 13,776,000
    15. Constantinople (Istanbul), Ottoman Empire (Turkey): 14,160,467
    16. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 11,616,000 
    17. Bombay (Mumbai), India: 20,748,395
    18. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: 2,850,000
    19. Warsaw, Russian Empire (Poland): 2,666,278
    20. Tianjin, China: 11,524,238



    The chart above compares the populations of the top ten most populated urban centres in the year 1900 with the population of their present urban amalgamations. 

    The chart above compares the populations of the 10-20th most populated urban centres in the year 1900 with the population of their present urban amalgamations.

    Based of these charts, cities on the Asian continent appear to have increased in population the most. As mentioned in the previous section, although some city proper populations have decreased (ie. UK & the USA), the populations of urban amalgamations have not largely due to the trend of suburbanization.


    5.6 An Interactive Map of the Urban Centres


    Below is a map showing the distribution of all of the urban centres in the world listed in the data. I maintain the colour-coding as close as possible to that used in this article. On the map as star icon represents 1,000,000+ inhabitants, diamond 500,000-1,000,000, square 250,000-500,000, and circle 100,000-250,000. When you click on an icon it will display a description that shows that urban centre's population in 1900 and its relative rank. 

    I've updated the data on this article since making the map, the rank in the description of each icon is slightly inaccurate. So it's best to refer to the data in the article. Nevertheless it gives you a good ballpark measurement. Here's a link to a version of the map where Google Street View is enabled: Map The only issue is that my overlay seems to intermittently crash from time to time so you might have to reload the map now and then.

    There's a full screen option on the map in the upper right of its interface, that version has a search bar that you can use to search for any of the urban centres.





    Further Reading and Related Articles



    For links to all of my related writings you can visit my Population Data and Architecture Articles page.



    7 References


    Currently the reference numbering is in the process of being updated. For now, if you see a reference below with two numbers the first number will be the new reference and the second one is the current reference number which corresponds to the numbers used in this article.

    1. Darling & son Ltd, (1901). Census of the British Empire. Portsmouth, United Kingdom: University of Portsmouth. Retrieved from the Cornell University LibraryVision of Britain, and Histpop. Histpop Pages: Queensland, AustraliaVictoria, AustraliaNew South Wales, AustraliaSouth AustraliaWestern AustraliaIrelandMunicipal & Police Burghs of Scotland;

    5. 1. Darling & son Ltd, (1901). Census of the British Empire. London, England. Retrieved from the Cornell University Library and Histpop.

    1. 18. Biguzzi, A. (2013) World city pop. Retrieved from: http://worldcitypop.com/1_data.asp

    2. 9. Rand McNally and Company. (1903). Rand McNally & Co.'s Enlarged Business Atlas and Shippers' Guide. Retrieved from the David Rumsey Collection. Text pages with population data: Central and South America; Europe; Europe and Asia; Asia and China; Korea and the Philippines; The Philippines and AfricaOceania;

    3. 6. Lahmeyer, J. (2006). Population statistics. Retrieved from http://www.populstat.info/

    4. 2. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1900). Data sheets: Urban Centres that have Ranked within the Top One-Hundred from 1790-1990. Related Wikipedia article.

    6. 25. Abrams, L., & Brown, C. G., (2010). A history of everyday life in twentieth century Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. Retrieved from Google Books.

    7. 26. Candler, T., (1974). Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth. St. David's University Press. 

    10. 27. Stanford, E. (1900). Stanford's library map of the world on Merctor's projection. Retrieved from the David Rumsey Collection

    12. 28. University of Michigan. (2006). Population growth over human history. Retrieved from globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange2/current/lectures/human_pop/human_pop.html  

    13. 29. University of Botswana History Department. (2000). Estimated world population, 1800-1950. Retrieved from: thuto.org/ubh/ub/h202/wpop1.htm